Heat Treatment Deformation Control of Spiral Bevel Gear Tooth Profile Based on Reverse Adjustment of Gear Cutting Parameters

1. Introduction

Spiral bevel gears are pivotal components in intersecting-axis transmission systems, widely used in automotive, aerospace, mining, and marine industries due to their smooth operation, high load capacity, and low noise. However, heat treatment-induced tooth profile deformation remains a critical challenge, leading to poor meshing, vibration, and reduced service life. This study proposes a reverse adjustment model for gear cutting parameters to pre-compensate heat treatment deformation, ensuring dimensional accuracy while preserving mechanical properties. The methodology integrates precise mathematical modeling of spiral bevel gears, multi-field coupled heat treatment simulation, sensitivity analysis of cutting parameters, and experimental validation.


2. Mathematical Modeling of Spiral Bevel Gears

2.1 Gear Cutting Principles

Spiral bevel gears are machined using a generating process where a hypothetical “crown gear” (represented by the machine’s cradle) interacts with the workpiece. The tooth surface geometry is derived from the relative motion between the cutting tool and gear blank. The coordinate systems for tool, machine, and workpiece are established to describe their kinematic relationships.

Key Equations for Tooth Surface Generation
For the pinion (small gear) and gear (large gear), the tooth surface equations are derived using coordinate transformations and meshing conditions. The pinion’s concave and convex surfaces are generated using single-indexing methods with tool tilt and swivel adjustments, while the gear is produced via double-sided cutting.

The parametric equation for the tool’s cutting edge is expressed as:rc​(θ,s)=​r01​sinα±scosθr01​cosα±ssinθssinα1​​

where r01​ is the tool tip radius, α is the pressure angle, θ is the rotational angle, and s is the linear displacement along the tool edge.

The meshing condition ensures continuous contact between the tool and workpiece:nv12​=0

where n is the surface normal vector, and v12​ is the relative velocity between the tool and workpiece.

2.2 Tooth Surface Discretization and 3D Modeling

Discrete points on the tooth surface are solved numerically using MATLAB, with boundary conditions defined by the gear’s geometric parameters (Table 1).

Table 1: Key Geometric Parameters of Spiral Bevel Gears

ParameterPinionGear
Number of Teeth939
Module (mm)7.187.18
Pressure Angle (°)2020
Spiral Angle (°)3535
Pitch Cone Angle (°)1377

The discrete points are imported into UG/NX to construct 3D models (Figure 1). The root fillet transition surface is included to enhance model accuracy.


3. Multi-Field Coupled Heat Treatment Simulation

3.1 Material Properties and Process Parameters

The spiral bevel gear material, 20CrMnTi low-carbon alloy steel, undergoes carburizing-quenching-tempering. Material properties (Table 2) are calculated using JMatPro software.

Table 2: Thermophysical Properties of 20CrMnTi

Temperature (°C)Thermal Conductivity (W/m·K)Specific Heat (J/kg·K)Expansion Coefficient (×10⁻⁶/°C)
2067.21446.920
50038.60707.010.76
90027.74610.411.21

3.2 Finite Element Model

A 1/3 symmetric model is meshed with 170,070 tetrahedral elements. The multi-field coupling model integrates carburization, temperature, microstructure, and stress-strain fields.

Governing Equations

  • Heat Transfer:

ρcp​∂tT​=∇⋅(λT)+Q

  • Carburization Diffusion:

tC​=∇⋅(DC)

  • Phase Transformation:
    Martensite volume fraction:

ξM​=1−exp[−α(Ms​−T)]

3.3 Simulation Results

  • Temperature Field: Rapid cooling at tooth tips (281.6°C at 7.9 s) contrasts with slow core cooling (736.6°C).
  • Carbon Distribution: Post-diffusion surface carbon content reaches 0.77%, with a carburized layer depth of 1.14 mm.
  • Microstructure: Surface hardness achieves 63.5 HRC (martensite), while the core remains 33.8 HRC (ferrite-pearlite).
  • Deformation Mechanism: Non-uniform phase transformation and thermal stress induce tooth profile distortion (max 0.12 mm at the tooth tip).

4. Sensitivity Analysis of Cutting Parameters

4.1 Tooth Profile Error Calculation

The deviation between nominal and adjusted tooth surfaces is quantified as:Δr=rnominal​−radjusted​

A sensitivity matrix S relates cutting parameter adjustments ΔP to profile errors Δrr=S⋅ΔP

Table 3: Influence Weights of Cutting Parameters

ParameterConcave Surface Error (mm)Convex Surface Error (mm)
Ratio of Roll (i)5.9017.228
Radial Tool Position3.4424.115
Tool Tilt Angle2.8763.504

4.2 Optimization Strategy

The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm solves the nonlinear inverse problem:ΔPmin​∥ΔrS⋅ΔP∥2

Optimal parameter adjustments pre-compensate heat treatment deformation.


5. Experimental Validation

5.1 Reverse Adjustment Machining

Pre-adjusted gears are machined using a Gleason Phoenix II CNC machine. Cutting parameters (Table 4) are modified based on sensitivity analysis.

Table 4: Adjusted Cutting Parameters for Pinion

ParameterNominal ValueAdjusted Value
Ratio of Roll4.27974.3121
Radial Tool Position (mm)133.35135.02
Tool Tilt Angle (°)24.0824.35

5.2 Heat Treatment and Measurement

Gears undergo carburizing (895°C, 1.1% C), quenching (830°C oil cooling), and tempering (180°C). Post-treatment tooth profiles are measured using a Klingelnberg P65 gear tester.

Results:

  • Concave Surface: Cumulative error reduced from 52 μm to 18 μm.
  • Convex Surface: Maximum error decreased from 68 μm to 23 μm.

6. Conclusion

  1. A reverse adjustment model for spiral bevel gear cutting parameters effectively compensates heat treatment-induced deformation.
  2. Multi-field coupled simulation accurately predicts carburization depth (1.14 mm), hardness distribution (63.5 HRC surface), and deformation patterns.
  3. Sensitivity analysis identifies ratio of roll as the most influential parameter, contributing 60–65% to tooth profile errors.
  4. Experimental validation confirms a 65–70% reduction in post-heat treatment errors, demonstrating the model’s industrial applicability.

This methodology enhances the precision of spiral bevel gear manufacturing, reducing reliance on post-heat treatment grinding and enabling cost-effective mass production. Future work will explore AI-driven adaptive control for real-time parameter optimization.

Scroll to Top