Vibration Characteristics Analysis of Spur Gear Transmission System with Non-Uniform Root Crack Distribution

This paper establishes a dynamic model for spur gear transmission systems considering non-uniform tooth root crack distribution. The proposed “slice method” divides spur gear teeth along the width direction into multiple thin sections, enabling precise calculation of time-varying meshing stiffness (TVMS) for each segment. The governing equations of motion are derived using D’Alembert’s principle, incorporating both translational and rotational degrees of freedom.

1. Dynamic Modeling of Cracked Spur Gears

The spur gear system considers five degrees of freedom for both pinion and gear:
$$m_k\ddot{X}_k + \sum_{i=1}^{n_s} N_{kx}^i \pm \sum_{i=1}^{n_s} F_{mx}^i = 0$$
$$m_k\ddot{Z}_k + \sum_{i=1}^{n_s} N_{kz}^i – m_kg = 0$$
where \(k = \{p,g\}\) represents pinion/gear, \(n_s\) denotes number of slices, and \(F_{mx}^i\) represents meshing force components.

2. Time-Varying Meshing Stiffness Calculation

The TVMS for each spur gear slice is calculated using modified Timoshenko beam theory:
$$K_m^i = \left( \frac{1}{K_{tg}^i} + \frac{1}{K_{tp}^i} + \frac{1}{K_{fg}^i} + \frac{1}{K_{fp}^i} + \frac{1}{K_h} \right)^{-1}$$
where:
$$K_t = \left( \frac{1}{K_b} + \frac{1}{K_s} + \frac{1}{K_a} \right)^{-1}$$
$$K_b = \int_0^{h_r} \frac{[\cos\alpha_r(h_r – x) – \sin\alpha_r]^2}{EI_x}dx$$

Table 1. Key Parameters of Spur Gear Pair
Parameter Gear Pinion
Module (mm) 8 8
Pressure Angle (°) 20 20
Teeth Number 120 23
Face Width (mm) 136 175
Young’s Modulus (GPa) 200

3. Bearing Contact Force Analysis

The contact forces between bearing races are derived as:
$$N_{kx}^j = K_{bx}(X_k + L_{a}\psi_k – X_{kb}^j) + C_{bx}(\dot{X}_k + L_{a}\dot{\psi}_k – \dot{X}_{kb}^j)$$
$$N_{kz}^j = K_{bz}(Z_k – L_{a}\phi_k – Z_{kb}^j) + C_{bz}(\dot{Z}_k – L_{a}\dot{\phi}_k – \dot{Z}_{kb}^j)$$
where \(j = \{1,2\}\) represents bearing positions.

4. Dynamic Response Characteristics

The dynamic transmission error (DTE) for spur gear slices shows significant variation:
$$\delta_i = R_{bg}\beta_g – R_{bp}\beta_p – (Z_g + L_i\phi_g) – (Z_p + L_i\phi_p)\cos\alpha_r – (X_p + L_i\psi_p)\sin\alpha_r$$
Non-uniform meshing forces create rotational moments:
$$T_\phi^i = F_m^iL_i\cos\alpha_r$$
$$T_\psi^i = F_m^iL_i\sin\alpha_r$$

5. Statistical Indicators for Crack Detection

Three statistical parameters effectively identify spur gear crack progression:

Kurtosis:
$$Ku = \frac{N\sum_{i=1}^N (x_i – \bar{x})^4}{\left[\sum_{i=1}^N (x_i – \bar{x})^2\right]^2}$$

Impulse Factor:
$$I_f = \frac{\max |x_i|}{\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N |x_i|}$$

Sideband Energy Ratio (SER):
$$SER = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^6 \sum_{j=-3}^3 (s_{i f_m + j} + s_{i f_m – j})}{\sum_{i=1}^6 s_{i f_m}}$$

6. Vibration Response Analysis

Key findings from spur gear vibration simulations:

  • Vertical vibration amplitudes exceed longitudinal components by 180%
  • Crack-induced sidebands appear at ±11.3Hz around meshing frequency (260Hz)
  • Left bearing vibration increases 37.5% compared to right bearing when crack initiates from left side

The proposed model demonstrates that spur gear systems with non-uniform root cracks exhibit distinctive vibration patterns measurable through bearing responses. The slice-based approach effectively captures localized stiffness variations, enabling precise fault severity assessment. Statistical indicators provide reliable metrics for monitoring crack progression in practical spur gear applications.

Scroll to Top