Calculation Method of Tooth Surface Temperature Rise of High-Contact-Ratio Spur Gear

1. Introduction

1.1 Background and Significance

Spur gear is widely used in mechanical transmission systems due to their simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and absence of axial forces. However, high-contact-ratio (HCR) spur gear (contact ratio ε≥2ε≥2) exhibit superior load-bearing capacity compared to low-contact-ratio (LCR) gears (1≤ε<21≤ε<2) by distributing loads across multiple meshing teeth. Despite this advantage, HCR spur gear face increased risks of tooth surface scuffing due to elevated sliding velocities and temperature rise. Accurate calculation and measurement of tooth surface temperature are critical for designing HCR spur gear with enhanced scuffing resistance.

1.2 Research Status

1.2.1 Scuffing Research

Scuffing, a sudden adhesive wear phenomenon under high pressure and temperature, has been studied extensively. Key contributions include:

  • Blok’s Flash Temperature Theory: Introduced the concept of instantaneous temperature rise at contact points.
  • Integral Temperature Method: Winter and Michaelis proposed averaging transient temperatures along the meshing line to evaluate scuffing risks.
  • Experimental Standards: FZG and CL-100 gear testers are widely used for scuffing resistance assessment.
1.2.2 HCR Spur Gear

Recent studies focus on HCR spur gear’ load distribution, stiffness, and dynamic behavior. However, research on their thermal characteristics, especially tooth surface temperature, remains limited.

1.3 Research Objectives

This study aims to:

  1. Analyze load distribution and stiffness of HCR spur gear.
  2. Develop a theoretical model for tooth surface temperature calculation based on Blok’s theory.
  3. Validate the model through temperature measurement experiments.
  4. Investigate the influence of gear parameters and operating conditions on temperature rise.

2. Load Distribution Analysis of HCR Spur Gear

2.1 Meshing Characteristics

HCR spur gear has three distinct meshing zones:

  • Three-tooth meshing zones: Near the root and tip regions.
  • Two-tooth meshing zones: Intermediate regions.

The dimensionless coordinate system along the meshing line is defined as:ry=tan⁡αytan⁡α′−1ry​=tanα′tanαy​​−1

where αyαy​ is the pressure angle at any meshing point, and α′α′ is the operating pressure angle.

2.2 Influence of Tooth Parameters on Contact Ratio

Key parameters affecting contact ratio (εε) include:

ParameterImpact on εεExample Trend (Table 2.1 Gear)
Addendum coefficient (ha∗ha∗​)ε∝ha∗εha∗​ha∗≥1.27⇒ε>2ha∗​≥1.27⇒ε>2
Pressure angle (αα)ε∝1/αε∝1/αα=20∘⇒ε=2.1α=20∘⇒ε=2.1
Number of teeth (ZZ)ε∝ZεZZ1=23⇒ε=2.1Z1​=23⇒ε=2.1
Profile shift coefficient (xx)ε∝1/xε∝1/xx1+x2<0.2⇒ε>2x1​+x2​<0.2⇒ε>2

2.3 Load Sharing Analysis

HCR spur gear exhibit lower single-tooth load-sharing rates compared to LCR gears:

Meshing ZoneHCR Spur Gear Load Sharing (%)LCR Spur Gear Load Sharing (%)
Three-tooth zone27.28 (min)
Two-tooth zone59.76 (max)100 (single-tooth zone)

3. Tooth Surface Temperature Calculation

3.1 Blok’s Flash Temperature Theory

The integral temperature (θintθint​) combines bulk temperature (θMθM​) and averaged flash temperature (θfla,intθfla,int​):θint=θM+C2⋅θfla,intθint​=θM​+C2​⋅θfla,int​

where C2=1.5C2​=1.5 is a weighting factor.

3.2 Key Correction Coefficients

Critical coefficients influencing θfla,intθfla,int​ include:

CoefficientFormulaImpact on Temperature
Friction (μmcμmc​)μmc=0.045⋅XR⋅XL2⋅ηoil−0.05⋅(XZ⋅ωBt)0.2(vΣP⋅ρredP)μmc​=0.045⋅XR​⋅XL2​⋅ηoil−0.05​⋅(vΣP​⋅ρredP​)(XZ​⋅ωBt​)0.2​μmc∝θflaμmc​∝θfla​
Pressure angle (XαβXαβ​)Xαβ=1.22⋅sin⁡0.25αt′cos⁡0.5αt′⋅cos⁡0.5αtXαβ​=1.22⋅cos0.5αt′​⋅cos0.5αt​sin0.25αt′​​Xαβ∝1/θflaXαβ​∝1/θfla​
Geometric (XBEXBE​)XBE=0.51⋅μ+1⋅XBE​=0.51⋅μ+1​⋅\rho_{E2})^{0.25}} )XBE∝θflaXBE​∝θfla​

3.3 Temperature Distribution Along Meshing Line

  • LCR Spur Gear: Maximum temperature occurs at the meshing-in point due to high sliding velocity.
  • HCR Spur Gear: Maximum temperature shifts to the transition point between three-tooth and two-tooth zones.
Gear TypeMax Temperature (°C)Location
LCR Spur Gear54.28Meshing-in point
HCR Spur Gear56.99Three-tooth/two-tooth transition

4. Experimental Validation

4.1 Test Setup

  • Gear Parameters:ParameterHCR Spur GearLCR Spur GearZ1/Z2Z1​/Z2​23/3025/32Module (mm)3.5 mm3.25 mmha∗ha∗​1.271.00εε2.11.64
  • Measurement: PT100 thermal resistors embedded at tooth root and tip.

4.2 Results and Comparison

Load StageHCR Spur Gear (°C)Theoretical (°C)Error (%)LCR Spur Gear (°C)Theoretical (°C)Error (%)
472.369.63.766.166.00.2
780.990.511.880.182.53.0
996.9112.816.484.9100.318.1
  • Key Findings:
    • Theoretical and experimental results align within 18% error.
    • HCR spur gear exhibit higher temperatures than LCR gears under identical loads.

5. Influence Factors on Tooth Surface Temperature

5.1 Tooth Parameters

ParameterImpact on HCR Spur GearImpact on LCR Spur Gear
Module (mm)θ∝1/mθ∝1/mθ∝1/mθ∝1/m
Surface roughnessθ∝RaθRaθ∝RaθRa
Addendum coefficientθ∝ha∗θha∗​Minimal impact
Pressure angleθ∝1/αθ∝1/αθ∝1/αθ∝1/α
Profile shift (xx)θ∝1/xθ∝1/xθ∝1/xθ∝1/x
Number of teethθ∝1/Zθ∝1/Zθ∝1/Zθ∝1/Z

5.2 Operating Conditions

ConditionImpact on HCR Spur GearImpact on LCR Spur Gear
Speed (nn)θ∝nθnθ∝nθn
Torque (TT)θ∝TθTθ∝TθT
Lubricant viscosityθ∝1/ηθ∝1/ηθ∝1/ηθ∝1/η

6. Conclusions and Future Work

6.1 Conclusions

  1. HCR spur gear reduce single-tooth load sharing by 40% compared to LCR gears.
  2. Maximum temperature in HCR spur gear occurs at three-tooth/two-tooth transition zones.
  3. Increasing module, pressure angle, or profile shift reduces tooth surface temperature.
  4. Experimental validation confirms theoretical models with <20% error.

6.2 Future Work

  1. Multi-parameter optimization for temperature reduction.
  2. Study of lubricant film thickness effects on scuffing resistance.
  3. Dynamic analysis of thermal-vibration coupling in HCR spur gear.
Scroll to Top