In modern manufacturing, CNC machine tools play a critical role as the “mother machines” of industry, providing essential equipment for mechanical processing. The protective door is a vital safety component that shields operators from hazards like flying chips and cutting fluids. However, many existing protective doors rely on manual operation, leading to issues such as instability, high maintenance, and safety risks. To address these challenges, I have developed an electric push rod-type protective door incorporating bevel gears to enhance automation, efficiency, and reliability. This design leverages bevel gears for motion transmission, ensuring smooth operation and robust performance. In this article, I will detail the design principles, hardware structure, and validation tests, emphasizing the integration of bevel gears to achieve superior functionality. The use of bevel gears allows for efficient power transmission between intersecting shafts, making them ideal for compact spaces in CNC applications.
The core working principle of this electric push rod mechanism involves converting rotational motion from a motor into linear motion to open and close the protective door. A motor drives a set of bevel gears, which transmit torque through a 90-degree angle to a screw mechanism. The bevel gears provide speed reduction and torque amplification, enabling the screw to actuate a linear push rod. This setup ensures precise control over the door’s movement, with bevel gears contributing to high transmission efficiency and minimal backlash. The overall system includes a drive motor, a reduction gearbox with bevel gears, a screw, limit switches, and a sealed plastic housing to protect against contaminants. Key technical targets include a push rod load capacity of at least 60 kg and a speed of 20 mm/s or higher. The incorporation of bevel gears facilitates a compact design while maintaining high durability, as they are known for their ability to handle heavy loads and provide smooth operation in demanding environments.
To achieve these goals, I utilized SolidWorks for 3D modeling and performed calculations for critical components like the screw and bevel gears. The design focuses on optimizing the bevel gear parameters to ensure efficient power transmission and longevity. For instance, the bevel gears are designed with specific tooth profiles to minimize wear and noise. The efficiency of the system is enhanced by the precise meshing of the bevel gears, which reduces energy losses. In the following sections, I will elaborate on the hardware design, including detailed parameter calculations and strength verifications for the bevel gears and screw. The use of bevel gears in this context not only improves performance but also aligns with industry trends toward automation and digital management, as they enable seamless integration with robotic systems for part handling.
Design Principles
The electric push rod mechanism operates by converting the rotary motion of a motor into linear displacement through a series of mechanical components. The motor initiates rotation, which is transmitted to a pair of bevel gears. These bevel gears are arranged at a 90-degree angle to change the direction of motion and provide speed reduction. The output from the bevel gears drives a screw, which converts the rotational motion into linear movement via a nut assembly. This linear motion actuates the push rod, thereby opening or closing the protective door. The inclusion of bevel gears is crucial for achieving a high transmission ratio in a confined space, as they offer advantages such as compactness, smooth operation, and high load capacity. The overall efficiency of the system depends on the design of the bevel gears, including factors like gear ratio, tooth geometry, and lubrication.
The kinematic relationship in the bevel gear transmission can be described using fundamental equations. For example, the gear ratio (i) for a pair of bevel gears is given by the ratio of the number of teeth on the driven gear (Z₂) to the number on the driving gear (Z₁): $$ i = \frac{Z_2}{Z_1} $$ This ratio determines the speed reduction and torque multiplication. In this design, I selected a gear ratio to achieve the desired push rod speed while maintaining sufficient torque. The linear speed of the push rod (v) is related to the rotational speed of the screw (N) and its lead (L_lead) by: $$ v = \frac{N \times L_{\text{lead}}}{60} $$ where v is in mm/s, N in RPM, and L_lead in mm. By optimizing the bevel gear parameters, I ensured that the system meets the target speed of 20 mm/s under a load of 60 kg.
Efficiency calculations are essential to minimize energy losses. The efficiency (η) of the bevel gear pair can be approximated using the formula: $$ \eta = \frac{\cos(\beta) – \mu \tan(\alpha)}{\cos(\beta) + \mu \cot(\alpha)} $$ where β is the spiral angle of the bevel gears, α is the pressure angle, and μ is the coefficient of friction. For the selected materials and lubrication, I assumed μ = 0.1, resulting in an efficiency of over 90% for the bevel gears. This high efficiency ensures that the motor operates within its optimal range, reducing heat generation and wear. Additionally, the screw mechanism employs a trapezoidal thread to enhance durability and reduce friction, with its efficiency calculated as: $$ \eta_{\text{screw}} = \frac{\tan(\lambda)}{\tan(\lambda + \rho)} $$ where λ is the lead angle of the screw, and ρ is the friction angle. The combined efficiency of the bevel gears and screw ensures that the overall system efficiency meets operational requirements.
Hardware Structure
The hardware structure of the electric push rod mechanism consists of several key components, including the drive motor, bevel gear reduction unit, screw, and protective housing. The bevel gears are central to the transmission system, designed to handle high loads while maintaining precision. I selected materials such as hardened steel for the bevel gears to withstand wear and tear. The screw is made of carbon steel with a trapezoidal thread profile to resist shear and bending stresses. The housing is constructed from waterproof plastic to shield internal components from chips and cutting fluids, thereby extending the lifespan of the mechanism. In this section, I will detail the design parameters and strength verifications for the bevel gears and screw, highlighting the role of bevel gears in ensuring reliability.
Bevel Gear Design
The bevel gears are designed to transmit motion between perpendicular shafts with a gear ratio of 3:1, providing adequate speed reduction for the application. The primary parameters include module (m), pressure angle (α), number of teeth (Z), and pitch diameter (D). I chose a module of 2 mm, a pressure angle of 20 degrees, and teeth counts of Z₁ = 20 for the driving gear and Z₂ = 60 for the driven gear. The pitch diameters are calculated as: $$ D_1 = m \times Z_1 = 2 \times 20 = 40 \, \text{mm} $$ $$ D_2 = m \times Z_2 = 2 \times 60 = 120 \, \text{mm} $$ The cone distance (R) for bevel gears is given by: $$ R = \frac{D_1}{2 \sin(\delta_1)} = \frac{D_2}{2 \sin(\delta_2)} $$ where δ₁ and δ₂ are the pitch angles, calculated as: $$ \delta_1 = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac{Z_1}{Z_2}\right) = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac{20}{60}\right) \approx 18.43^\circ $$ $$ \delta_2 = 90^\circ – \delta_1 \approx 71.57^\circ $$ These parameters ensure proper meshing and load distribution.
The tooth geometry of the bevel gears is critical for minimizing stress and wear. I used Gleason system standards for spiral bevel gears to enhance smoothness and load capacity. The face width (b) is set to 10 mm, and the spiral angle (β) is 35 degrees to optimize contact ratio and reduce noise. The dynamic load on the bevel gears is calculated based on the transmitted power (P) and pitch line velocity (v_t). For a motor power of 1.5 kW and rotational speed of 1500 RPM, the torque (T) on the driving gear is: $$ T = \frac{9.55 \times 10^6 \times P}{N} = \frac{9.55 \times 10^6 \times 1.5}{1500} = 9550 \, \text{N·mm} $$ The tangential force (F_t) on the bevel gears is: $$ F_t = \frac{2T}{D_1} = \frac{2 \times 9550}{40} = 477.5 \, \text{N} $$ This force is used to verify the bending and contact stresses.
To ensure durability, I performed strength checks for the bevel gears. The bending stress (σ_b) is evaluated using the Lewis formula: $$ \sigma_b = \frac{F_t}{b \cdot m \cdot Y} $$ where Y is the tooth form factor, taken as 0.3 for bevel gears. Substituting values: $$ \sigma_b = \frac{477.5}{10 \times 2 \times 0.3} = 79.58 \, \text{MPa} $$ The allowable bending stress for hardened steel is 300 MPa, providing a safety factor of 3.77. For contact stress (σ_c), the formula is: $$ \sigma_c = \sqrt{\frac{F_t}{b \cdot D_1} \cdot \frac{1}{\cos(\alpha)} \cdot E} $$ where E is the modulus of elasticity (210 GPa for steel). Calculating: $$ \sigma_c = \sqrt{\frac{477.5}{10 \times 40} \cdot \frac{1}{\cos(20^\circ)} \cdot 210 \times 10^3} \approx 987 \, \text{MPa} $$ The allowable contact stress is 1500 MPa, resulting in a safety factor of 1.52. These verifications confirm that the bevel gears can handle the operational loads reliably.

Screw Design and Analysis
The screw converts rotational motion from the bevel gears into linear movement. I selected a trapezoidal thread with an outer diameter of 20 mm, pitch of 5 mm, and lead of 10 mm (double-start). The screw material is carbon steel with a yield strength of 420 MPa. The lead angle (λ) is calculated as: $$ \lambda = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac{L_{\text{lead}}}{\pi \cdot d_2}\right) $$ where d₂ is the pitch diameter, approximately 18 mm for this screw. Thus: $$ \lambda = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac{10}{\pi \times 18}\right) \approx 9.93^\circ $$ The efficiency of the screw is determined using the friction angle (ρ), where μ = 0.1: $$ \rho = \tan^{-1}(\mu) \approx 5.71^\circ $$ $$ \eta_{\text{screw}} = \frac{\tan(\lambda)}{\tan(\lambda + \rho)} = \frac{\tan(9.93^\circ)}{\tan(9.93^\circ + 5.71^\circ)} \approx 0.65 $$ This efficiency is acceptable for the application, considering the load requirements.
Strength verifications for the screw include shear and bending checks. The shear stress (τ) on the screw thread under a load of 60 kg (588.6 N) is: $$ \tau = \frac{F}{\pi \cdot d_1 \cdot b \cdot z} $$ where d₁ is the root diameter (16 mm), b is the thread width (2.5 mm), and z is the number of engaged threads (assumed as 4). Substituting: $$ \tau = \frac{588.6}{\pi \times 16 \times 2.5 \times 4} \approx 1.17 \, \text{MPa} $$ The allowable shear stress for carbon steel is 252 MPa, giving a high safety factor. For bending stress, the screw thread is treated as a cantilever beam: $$ \sigma_b = \frac{3F \cdot h}{\pi \cdot d_1 \cdot b^2 \cdot z} $$ where h is the thread height (2 mm). Thus: $$ \sigma_b = \frac{3 \times 588.6 \times 2}{\pi \times 16 \times (2.5)^2 \times 4} \approx 5.63 \, \text{MPa} $$ The allowable bending stress is 420 MPa, indicating sufficient strength. These calculations ensure the screw can withstand operational stresses without failure.
To summarize the hardware parameters, I have compiled key data in the following table:
| Parameter | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Bevel Gear Module | 2 | mm |
| Pressure Angle | 20 | degrees |
| Driving Gear Teeth (Z₁) | 20 | – |
| Driven Gear Teeth (Z₂) | 60 | – |
| Gear Ratio | 3 | – |
| Screw Outer Diameter | 20 | mm |
| Screw Lead | 10 | mm |
| Screw Efficiency | 65 | % |
| Allowable Bending Stress (Bevel Gear) | 300 | MPa |
| Allowable Contact Stress (Bevel Gear) | 1500 | MPa |
Testing and Validation
After assembling the electric push rod mechanism, I conducted extensive tests to validate its performance under realistic conditions. The tests focused on load capacity, speed, noise levels, and durability, with particular attention to the behavior of the bevel gears. The mechanism was installed on a CNC machine tool protective door and subjected to cyclic operations over 1000 hours. The bevel gears exhibited minimal wear, thanks to their hardened surfaces and proper lubrication. The push rod achieved a consistent speed of 21.8 mm/s under a load of 60 kg, exceeding the target of 20 mm/s. Noise levels were measured at 36 dB, indicating smooth operation attributable to the precision-machined bevel gears.
During testing, I monitored parameters such as torque transmission and temperature rise. The bevel gears maintained an efficiency of over 90%, with no significant heat generation. The screw mechanism showed no signs of deformation or excessive wear. To quantify the results, I recorded key performance metrics in the table below:
| Test Parameter | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Push Rod Load Capacity | 60 | kg |
| Opening Speed | 21.8 | mm/s |
| Closing Speed | 21.8 | mm/s |
| Noise Level | 36 | dB |
| Operating Temperature | 45 | °C |
| Bevel Gear Wear | Negligible | – |
| System Efficiency | 85 | % |
Challenges encountered during testing included minor misalignments in the bevel gear assembly, which were corrected by adjusting the housing mounts. The use of bevel gears proved advantageous due to their self-locking characteristics in certain configurations, though this design opted for continuous operation. The sealed housing effectively prevented contamination from chips and fluids, ensuring long-term reliability. These tests confirm that the electric push rod mechanism with bevel gears meets the desired specifications for CNC machine tool applications, offering a robust solution for automated protective doors.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the development of this electric push rod-type protective door based on bevel gear structure demonstrates significant advancements in automation and safety for CNC machine tools. The integration of bevel gears enables efficient motion transmission, high load capacity, and compact design, addressing the limitations of manual doors. Through detailed design calculations and rigorous testing, I have verified that the mechanism achieves reliable performance under operational loads. The use of bevel gears not only enhances efficiency but also reduces maintenance needs, making it suitable for industrial environments. This design can be extended to other machinery such as injection molding machines and presses, promoting broader adoption of automated safety systems. Future work may focus on optimizing the bevel gear geometry for even higher efficiency and exploring smart control systems for predictive maintenance.
