Failure Analysis of Grinding Cracks in Shearer Gears

Shearer gears operate under extreme conditions in underground coal mining. During final inspection of disk-shaped gears for an EC710 shearer (rated capacity: 528 t/h), surface grinding cracks were detected. Given the severe economic impact of in-mine repairs, comprehensive failure analysis was performed on the affected batch.

Failure Background

Cracks measuring 4–8 mm appeared at tooth roots after magnetic particle inspection (GB/T 15822.1-2005). Key observations:

  • Parallel cracking perpendicular to grinding direction
  • Black oxidation zones co-located with grinding cracks
  • Macroscopic characteristics suggesting thermal origin

Manufacturing process sequence: Forging → Normalizing → Rough machining → Carburizing (920°C) → Quenching → Low-temp tempering (200°C) → Grinding → Shot peening.

Material Composition Examination

Chemical analysis (GB/T 4336-2002) of 25CrMo steel:

Element Surface (wt%) Core (wt%) Standard (GB/T 3077-2015)
C 1.03 0.27 0.22–0.29 (core)
Cr 1.16 1.14 0.90–1.20
Mn 0.85 0.86 0.60–0.90
Mo 0.24 0.21 0.15–0.30
Si 0.35 0.32 0.17–0.37

Compliance confirmed with no segregation detected.

Microstructural Examination

Microstructure analysis (GB/T 13298-2015, GB/T 25744-2010):

Location Microstructure Rating
Normal zone (surface) Martensite + retained austenite Grade 2
Normal zone (core) Low-carbon martensite + free ferrite Grade 3
Oxidized zone (surface) Tempered troostite + spheroidized carbides N/A

Critical observations in grinding crack zones:

  • Microstructural evidence of tempering (carbide precipitation)
  • Crack propagation morphology: Y-shaped branching (depth: 1.68 mm)
  • Thermal influence limited to surface layers

Hardness Gradient Analysis

Vickers hardness profiles (GB/T 9450-2005, load: 9.8 N):

Effective case depth calculation:

$$ \text{CHD} = d_{550 \text{HV}} $$

where \(d_{550 \text{HV}}\) is depth where hardness reaches 550 HV.

Zone Surface Hardness (HV) Effective Case Depth (mm) Core Hardness (HV)
Normal 698 2.30 380
Oxidized 450 2.20 375

Hardness anomaly in oxidized zones:

$$ \Delta H = H_{\text{normal}} – H_{\text{oxidized}} = 248 \text{ HV} $$

indicating significant thermal softening.

Thermo-Mechanical Analysis of Grinding Cracks

Grinding cracks originated through synergistic mechanisms:

1. Thermal Shock Stress:

$$ \sigma_{\text{thermal}} = E \alpha \Delta T $$

where \(E\) = Young’s modulus (210 GPa), \(\alpha\) = thermal expansion coefficient (12.5 × 10⁻⁶/°C), \(\Delta T\) ≈ 600°C (estimated).

2. Phase Transformation Stress:

$$ \Delta V = \left( \frac{V_{\gamma} – V_{\alpha’}}{V_{\gamma}} \right) \approx 4\% $$

Austenite (γ) to martensite (α’) transformation during requenching generates tensile stress.

3. Residual Stress Superposition:

$$ \sigma_{\text{total}} = \sigma_{\text{thermal}} + \sigma_{\text{phase}} + \sigma_{\text{residual}} $$

When \(\sigma_{\text{total}} > \sigma_{\text{UTS}}\) (material ultimate tensile strength), grinding cracks initiate.

Root Cause Identification

Primary factors inducing grinding cracks:

  1. Excessive grinding heat generation:
    • Temperature > Ac1 (≈750°C)
    • Localized austenitization
  2. Insufficient cooling:
    $$ \dot{q}_{\text{cooling}} < \dot{q}_{\text{generation}} $$
  3. Original grinding parameters:
    • Depth of cut: 0.08 mm/pass
    • Al2O3 grinding wheel (high friability)

Corrective Measures and Validation

Implemented solutions for grinding crack mitigation:

Parameter Original Optimized Effect
Abrasive type Brown alumina White alumina ↓ Heat generation by 35%
Depth of cut 0.08 mm/pass 0.04 mm/pass ↓ Grinding force by 50%
Stress relief None 160°C × 72h ↓ Residual stress by 40%

Validation results after optimization:

  • 0 grinding cracks in subsequent 150 gear batches
  • Surface hardness consistency: ΔHV < 30
  • Microstructural uniformity confirmed

Conclusions

  1. Grinding cracks exhibited perpendicular orientation to grinding direction with associated oxidation zones
  2. Thermal softening in affected regions (ΔHV ≈ 250) confirmed microstructural degradation
  3. The fundamental mechanism involves combined thermal and transformation stresses:
    $$ \sigma_{\text{total}} = E \alpha \Delta T + K \Delta V + \sigma_R $$
  4. Process optimization successfully eliminated grinding cracks through:
    • Abrasive system modification
    • Reduced grinding aggression
    • Pre-grinding stress relief

This systematic approach provides a general framework for preventing grinding cracks in high-performance gears subjected to abusive machining conditions.

Scroll to Top