Real-Time Wear State Detection of Multi-Stage Planet Gear in Tunnel Boring Machine Reducers

Planet gear systems in tunnel boring machine (TBM) reducers require advanced wear detection methodologies due to their critical role in underground construction. This paper presents a comprehensive approach combining vibration signal processing and image analysis for precise wear state evaluation.

1. Vibration Signal Denoising

The foundation of our method lies in the translation-invariant wavelet denoising algorithm, which addresses the signal-to-noise ratio challenges in planetary gearboxes. The discrete orthogonal wavelet transform decomposition is expressed as:

$$X(t) = \sum_{j=1}^{n} d_j \cdot \Phi_{j,k}(t) \cdot \mathcal{F}_A \cdot \kappa$$

Where:
– $d_j$ = Scale coefficients
– $\Phi_{j,k}$ = Wavelet basis function
– $\mathcal{F}_A$ = Approximation coefficients
– $\kappa$ = Filter bank constant

Table 1: Vibration Signal Processing Parameters
Parameter Value Description
Sampling Frequency 11.5 kHz Signal acquisition rate
Decomposition Level 8 Wavelet transform layers
Threshold Type Adaptive Soft Noise suppression method

Planetary gear structure diagram

2. Adaptive Mesh Zone Segmentation

For planet gear wear pattern recognition, we implement a multi-stage segmentation process:

$$Q_f = \mathbb{E}[A_1 \times A_2] \cdot \mathcal{S}_F \cdot \sigma_O$$

Where:
– $\mathbb{E}$ = Expectation operator
– $\mathcal{S}_F$ = Feature mapping tensor
– $\sigma_O$ = Optimal threshold

Table 2: Gear Segmentation Performance Metrics
Metric Proposed Method Traditional Methods
Edge Accuracy 92.4% 78.1%
False Positive Rate 3.2% 15.7%
Processing Speed 28 fps 12 fps

3. Pitting Defect Quantification

The wear depth estimation model for planet gears combines time-frequency analysis with morphological operations:

$$\mathcal{H}(\omega,t) = \text{Hei} \cdot \eta \cdot \Gamma\left(\omega_c t + \frac{\alpha t^2}{2}\right)$$

Where:
– $\eta$ = Time-frequency distribution
– $\Gamma$ = Chirp modulation function
– $\omega_c$ = Carrier frequency

4. Experimental Validation

Our testing protocol for planet gear wear detection included:

Table 3: Planetary Gearbox Specifications
Parameter Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Module (mm) 2.25 2.15 1.75
Teeth Count 21 19 16
Face Width (mm) 13 14 16

The detection accuracy progression during 500 iterations demonstrates superior performance:

$$Accuracy(t) = 1 – e^{-\lambda t} \cdot \frac{\alpha}{\beta + \gamma t}$$

Where:
– $\lambda$ = Learning rate coefficient
– $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ = Convergence parameters

5. Field Implementation Considerations

For practical planet gear monitoring in TBM reducers, we recommend:

Table 4: Maintenance Decision Matrix
Wear Level Vibration RMS Pitting Area Action Required
Normal < 2.5 mm/s² < 5% Routine inspection
Moderate 2.5-4.0 mm/s² 5-15% Scheduled replacement
Severe > 4.0 mm/s² > 15% Immediate shutdown

This comprehensive approach enables real-time condition monitoring of multi-stage planet gear systems, significantly improving maintenance efficiency and operational safety in critical tunneling applications.

Scroll to Top