Strength and Fatigue Analysis of Rack and Pinion Gear in Shearing Machine

In the steel industry, the final stage of production involves rolling mills, where various products like billets, slabs, and plates are cut to specific lengths using shearing machines. These machines, including parallel-blade, inclined-blade, disc-type, and flying shears, rely on robust transmission systems to operate efficiently. Among these, the rack and pinion gear mechanism stands out due to its ability to convert rotational motion into linear motion with high power transmission, longevity, and stability. This study focuses on analyzing the strength and fatigue life of a rack and pinion gear system used in an inclined-blade shearing machine developed independently by a company. The objective is to verify whether the system meets operational requirements under dynamic loads. Using SolidWorks for 3D modeling and ANSYS Workbench for finite element analysis (FEA), I conducted transient dynamic and fatigue life simulations to evaluate parameters like equivalent stress, strain, radial displacement, and fatigue cycles. The results demonstrate that the rack and pinion gear assembly fulfills all design criteria, ensuring reliability in industrial applications.

The rack and pinion gear mechanism is a critical component in many mechanical systems, offering advantages such as high load capacity and smooth operation. In this analysis, I employed advanced simulation techniques to assess its performance under real-world conditions. The process began with creating a detailed 3D model of the rack and pinion gear system based on actual design parameters. The gear and rack were modeled using the Toolbox feature in SolidWorks, ensuring accurate tooth profiles and engagement. Key parameters for the rack and pinion gear are summarized in Table 1, which includes module, pressure angle, number of teeth, and face width. These parameters are essential for defining the geometry and meshing characteristics of the rack and pinion system.

Table 1: Basic Parameters of the Rack and Pinion Gear
Component Module (mm) Pressure Angle (°) Number of Teeth Face Width (mm)
Pinion 2.5 20 30 30
Rack 2.5 20 38 30

After assembling the components in SolidWorks, I imported the model into ANSYS Workbench for further analysis. The rack and pinion gear assembly was subjected to transient dynamic analysis to simulate time-varying loads and fatigue analysis to predict service life. The use of FEA allows for a comprehensive evaluation without extensive physical testing, reducing costs and development time. The following sections detail the material properties, mesh generation, theoretical foundations, and simulation results for both transient dynamics and fatigue life of the rack and pinion gear system.

For the rack and pinion gear analysis, I defined the material properties to reflect real-world conditions. Both the pinion and rack were made of 45 steel, a common material in mechanical engineering due to its balanced strength and durability. The material properties are listed in Table 2, including elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, density, and yield strength. These values are crucial for accurate stress and strain calculations in the finite element model. In ANSYS Workbench, I assigned these properties to the respective components within the Transient Structural module to ensure realistic behavior during simulations.

Table 2: Material Properties of 45 Steel for Rack and Pinion Gear
Property Value
Elastic Modulus 210 GPa
Poisson’s Ratio 0.31
Density 7850 kg/m³
Yield Strength 355 MPa

Mesh generation is a fundamental step in FEA, as it discretizes the model into finite elements for numerical solution. I used the Mesh module in ANSYS Workbench to create a hybrid mesh combining hexahedral and tetrahedral elements. This approach balances computational efficiency and accuracy; hexahedral elements provide higher precision in critical areas like the tooth surfaces of the rack and pinion gear, while tetrahedral elements simplify meshing in complex regions. To capture detailed stress concentrations, I refined the mesh on the tooth profiles of both the rack and pinion, setting an element size of 1 mm. The meshed model consisted of numerous elements and nodes, ensuring reliable results for the rack and pinion gear analysis. The mesh statistics are provided in Table 3, highlighting the element types and counts used in the simulation.

Table 3: Mesh Details for Rack and Pinion Gear Model
Component Element Type Element Size (mm) Number of Elements
Pinion Teeth Hexahedral 1 Approx. 15,000
Rack Teeth Hexahedral 1 Approx. 18,000
Other Regions Tetrahedral 2 Approx. 50,000

Transient dynamic analysis was performed to evaluate the rack and pinion gear system’s response under time-dependent loads. This type of analysis solves the equation of motion for the structure over a specified time period, accounting for inertia and damping effects. The general form of the transient dynamic equation is given by:

$$ M\{\ddot{x}(t)\} + C\{\dot{x}(t)\} + K\{x(t)\} = F(t) $$

where \( M \) is the mass matrix, \( C \) is the damping matrix, \( K \) is the stiffness matrix, \( F(t) \) is the time-varying load vector, \( \{\ddot{x}(t)\} \) is the acceleration vector, \( \{\dot{x}(t)\} \) is the velocity vector, and \( \{x(t)\} \) is the displacement vector. For the rack and pinion gear system, this equation models the dynamic interaction during meshing, capturing stress variations over time.

To simulate real operating conditions, I applied constraints and loads in ANSYS Workbench. The pinion was assigned a revolute joint relative to the ground, allowing rotation about its axis while constraining other degrees of freedom. A rotational velocity of 10 rpm in the clockwise direction was applied to the pinion, simulating the driving motion. The rack was given a translational joint, permitting only horizontal linear movement. A point mass of 70 kg and a resistance force of 12 kN were applied to the rack to represent the load during shearing operations. Frictional contact with a coefficient of 0.2 was defined between the pinion and rack teeth, with the pinion teeth as the contact surface and rack teeth as the target surface. The analysis settings included an initial time step of 25, minimum of 20, and maximum of 300 steps to ensure convergence.

The results from the transient dynamic analysis revealed valuable insights into the rack and pinion gear behavior. The maximum equivalent stress occurred at 1.63 seconds, with a peak value of 251 MPa. According to the von Mises yield criterion, which is suitable for ductile materials like 45 steel, the equivalent stress \( \sigma_{vm} \) is calculated as:

$$ \sigma_{vm} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}\left[ (\sigma_1 – \sigma_2)^2 + (\sigma_2 – \sigma_3)^2 + (\sigma_3 – \sigma_1)^2 \right]} $$

where \( \sigma_1 \), \( \sigma_2 \), and \( \sigma_3 \) are the principal stresses. The yield strength of 45 steel is 355 MPa, and with a safety factor of 1.3, the allowable stress is 273 MPa. Since the maximum stress of 251 MPa is below this limit, the rack and pinion gear meets strength requirements. Additionally, the maximum contact stress on the pinion teeth was 74.2 MPa, well within safe levels. The stress distribution showed that the highest stresses were near the pitch line on the tooth roots, consistent with typical gear contact mechanics.

Strain and displacement results further validated the rack and pinion gear performance. The maximum equivalent strain was \( 1.18 \times 10^{-3} \), and the maximum radial displacement was \( 1.06 \times 10^{-3} \) mm, indicating minimal deformation and no significant vibrations. The contact state analysis confirmed proper meshing without tooth adhesion or collision, ensuring smooth operation. Time-history plots of equivalent stress and strain, as shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10 analogs, demonstrated stable cyclic behavior after an initial engagement peak, reflecting consistent rack and pinion gear dynamics under load.

For fatigue life analysis, I utilized the Fatigue Tool in ANSYS Workbench, focusing on high-cycle fatigue due to the rack and pinion gear’s long-term operation. The S-N curve approach was employed, which relates stress amplitude to the number of cycles to failure. The general form of the S-N curve is expressed as:

$$ \sigma^m N = C $$

where \( \sigma \) is the stress amplitude, \( N \) is the number of cycles, and \( m \) and \( C \) are material constants. For 45 steel, I defined the S-N curve based on empirical data in the ANSYS material library. Fatigue damage accumulation was evaluated using nonlinear theories and rainflow counting to account for load sequence effects, which are critical for accurate life prediction in rack and pinion gear systems.

The fatigue analysis results for the rack and pinion gear indicated a minimum life of \( 2.2633 \times 10^5 \) cycles at the tooth contact region, where stresses are highest. This value exceeds typical industrial requirements, confirming the rack and pinion’s durability. The damage was calculated using Miner’s rule and nonlinear cumulative damage models. Miner’s rule assumes linear damage summation:

$$ D = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{N_i} $$

where \( D \) is the total damage, and \( N_i \) is the fatigue life at stress level \( i \). For critical damage, \( D_{CR} = 1 \). However, nonlinear models consider interactions between load cycles, providing a more realistic assessment for the rack and pinion gear under variable amplitudes.

In conclusion, the comprehensive analysis of the rack and pinion gear system in the shearing machine demonstrates that it satisfies all strength and fatigue life criteria. The transient dynamic analysis showed stress and strain values within safe limits, with stable behavior over time. The fatigue life prediction revealed a sufficient number of cycles for long-term operation. This methodology can be extended to other mechanical systems utilizing rack and pinion gears, offering a reliable framework for design validation and optimization. The use of FEA tools like ANSYS Workbench proves invaluable for reducing development costs and enhancing product reliability in industrial applications.

Throughout this study, I emphasized the importance of accurate modeling and simulation for rack and pinion gear mechanisms. The integration of 3D CAD and FEA enables detailed insights into dynamic performance and longevity. Future work could explore variations in material properties, lubrication effects, or different loading scenarios to further optimize rack and pinion gear designs. By adhering to rigorous engineering principles, this approach ensures that rack and pinion systems operate efficiently and safely in demanding environments like steel mills.

Scroll to Top